On 20 February 2014 19:48, Andreas Metzler <[email protected]> wrote: > Dariusz Dwornikowski <[email protected]> wrote: >> I am working on a MaraDNS package, the upstream Author, Sam Trenholme >> suggested that maybe it could also worth packaging ndjbdns, a djbdns >> fork but with GPL licence and all bugs fixed. Also the upstream of >> ndjbdns is quite responsive and active. > [...] > > Hello, > > from a users point of view I would love to see a tiny performing DNS > cache in Debian which is maintained upstream. However judging from the > respective descriptions on the web I guess that deadwood should work > as well as a djbdns fork. > > OTOH I wonder what would keep you as maintainer interested in taking > care of two different packages doing basically the same job. You will > soon find out that you like one better and will only use this one. You > might then have a hard time motivating yourself to invest time in the > other one. >
Thank you. I think ill just stick to maintaining maraDNS then. -- Pozdrawiam, Dariusz Dwornikowski, Assistant Institute of Computing Science, Poznań University of Technology www.cs.put.poznan.pl/ddwornikowski/ room 2.7.2 BTiCW | tel. +48 61 665 29 41 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagnkunf0xen1swlddttpeu2v_dvb81cvx99o1xc1cr3t-b6...@mail.gmail.com
