On Thursday 27 March 2014 22:21:55 Nico Schlömer wrote: > The question remains on how we can move this forward in a sensible > way. One possibility is to split the existing netcdf package into > three separate ones netcdf-c, netcdf-fortran, netcdf-cxx, to reflect > the upstream structure. > > What is your opinion on this?
Matching upstream structure makes sense. But you will have to consider the impact on the packages that depend on netcdf-bin: $ apt-cache rdepends netcdf-bin netcdf-bin Reverse Depends: netcdf-bin:i386 v-sim-plugins libnetcdf-dev minc-tools science-nanoscale-physics science-meteorology-dev science-dataacquisition gis-workstation gis-remotesensing The question is: how to avoid breaking the above package when upgrading netcdf to netcdf-c, netcdf-fortran, netcdf-cxx ? Hope this helps -- https://github.com/dod38fr/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/ http://ddumont.wordpress.com/ -o- irc: dod at irc.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/2572115.ZjIftkGxgs@ylum
