Everything that is interesting in the current netcdf-bin is included in the C-library of netCDF. The only binaries included in the C++ and Fortran builds are configuration assistants that are losing their significance in the new CMake builds anyways. Hence, I'd say it's reasonable to make netcdfc-bin the "new" netcdf-bin.
Cheers, Nico On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Eric L. <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On 28 March 2014 09:20:01 CET, Dominique Dumont <[email protected]> wrote: >>On Thursday 27 March 2014 22:21:55 Nico Schlömer wrote: >>The question is: how to avoid breaking the above package when upgrading >>netcdf >>to netcdf-c, netcdf-fortran, netcdf-cxx ? > What about declaring netcdf-bin as dummy package depending on the 3 new ones, > and ask (or file bugs against) the dependent package(r)s to change their > dependencies. > > Eric > > I'm on debian-java, java maintainers, vdr maintainers and debian-mentors; no > need to CC me on these lists. Thanks! > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] > Archive: > https://lists.debian.org/[email protected] > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAK6Z60fCu0eBoQz7Oqmy4RY=q6nnue6re4d605bikupdo8u...@mail.gmail.com
