Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[email protected]> writes:
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2014, Ole Streicher wrote:
>> Paul Wise <[email protected]> writes:
>> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Ole Streicher wrote:
>> >> I am just looking for a solution for this problem...
>> >
>> > It might be easier to port the software to something that isn't
>> > non-free so the package can be put in main.
>>
>> As you can see from the bug, dependency from pgplot is quite common. It
>> seems not so easy to have a free replacement for that.
>>
>> At the end, this is what contrib is for, isn't it?
>
> Not really, although it can certainly be used like that (when autobuilding
> doesn't get in the way).
The policy manual says (2.2.2):
| The contrib archive area contains supplemental packages intended to
| work with the Debian distribution, but which require software outside
| of the distribution to either build or function.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Which lists a non-free build requirement as its first use case of contrib.
> Contrib is well-suited to packages that require non-free data. It has
> always had a problem when there are build-time dependencies on
> non-free.
Sure. The bug #690282 is two years old. All I ask here is how this can
be changed, or what the effective way is to support all platforms
here -- especially for a DM without abusing his mentor.
> Actually, for a *long* time we didn't even autobuild anything in contrib or
> non-free.
So, the first step is done, but not the second?
Best
Ole
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
