Hi, On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 at 15:03:16 +0000, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > +Maintainer: Guilhem Moulin <[email protected]> > +Uploaders: Gerrit Pape <[email protected]>, > > I would do the opposite, but well, as you wish :)
I don't mind either way :-) But why would you swap the addresses? (Yes I read section 3.3 of the policy, it didn't help me understanding.) > I think dh-autoreconf is already enough, but please double check (I didn't > test a build) Ah yes indeed, I forgot to remove autoconf and automake after deciding to add dh-autoreconf to Build-Depends as a fix for #689618. > 2)changelog: changes are huge, maybe urgency=low might be more appropriate > (or experimental) Alright. I went for medium urgency as the upload fixes some important bugs, but none were RC indeed. > 3)copyright: with upstream MIT, and you GPL-2 or GPL-3, it becomes impossible > to forward patches > to them. > > Do you have any good reason for using a different license? GPL vs MIT is not my choice, as debian/initramfs/* was originally contributed by <[email protected]> under GPL-2+. Anyway upstream could as well GPL-license the remote cryptroot unlocking feature, but AFAIK they are not interested in merging it. Cheers, -- Guilhem.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
