Hi Ghislain, On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 08:29:42AM +0000, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > > >Did you checked whether the documentation is properly built? > > Yes, although the -doc package only contains the HTML documentation. I > checked it and it runs fine. I can add the pdf build if it is a blocker.
It s no blocker for me - just stumbled upon it and if you are aware of this it is fine for me. > >Moreover as far as Debian Med policy concerns all packages should be > >by default > > > > Priority: optional > > > >I'm not sure about Debian Science policy but I think it is - or at least > >it should be IMHO - the same. Do you have any reason to choose "extra"? > > An artefact from `debmake`. Will correct that. I recommend to not use debmake. Debian Med provides a template which creates way less work and leads to way less errors. I'v pushed the change and will build + upload as per current state (if you do not want me to wait for other changes. > >Finally there is an embedded JS copy: > > > >W: libopengm-doc: embedded-javascript-library > >usr/share/doc/libopengm-doc/html/jquery.js please use libjs-jquery > > Raised to me by Gianfranco. Also discussed in [1]. > > cat /usr/share/doc/doxygen/README.jquery > > [...] > It is not considered a problem for Doxygen or packages using Doxygen to > embed jquery. In fact replacing the `jquery.js` file created by Doxygen > likely results in broken documentation. Packages doing that are buggy. > Lintian will have to learn that a `jquery.js` embedded by Doxygen is a > normal thing. > [...] > > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/10/msg00774.html OK. No strong opinion about this. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
