Hi,
it seems the architectures got created ...
----- Forwarded message from Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-----
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: by paradigm.rfc822.org (Postfix, from userid 10)
id B94788FA7; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 10:05:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from master.debian.org (master.debian.org [216.234.231.5])
by noose.gt.owl.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765737F7
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 05:03:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gecko by master.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
id 12zW7u-0006i5-00; Tue, 06 Jun 2000 22:03:30 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Florian Lohoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Bug#62258 acknowledged by developer ([AFTER MOVE TO AURIC] new
architectures debian-mips and debian-mipsel)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debian-PR-Message: they-closed 62258
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 22:03:30 -0500
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Length: 2080
Lines: 52
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is
unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate
message then please contact the developer directly, or email
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or me.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Received: (at 62258-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jun 2000 03:03:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 06 22:03:03 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.90]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
id 12zW7S-0006dB-00; Tue, 06 Jun 2000 22:03:02 -0500
Received: from ruari-quinn.demon.co.uk ([158.152.170.83]
helo=dt-jtlaptop.datatrans)
by anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1)
id 12zW7N-000GDQ-0W
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 04:02:58 +0100
Received: from james by dt-jtlaptop.datatrans with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 12zW03-0003xr-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 07 Jun 2000 03:55:23 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: binary-mips and binary-mipsel created
Mail-Copies-To: never
From: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 07 Jun 2000 03:55:23 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 12
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Sorry for the delay. I've now created binary-mips and binary-mipsel
on both ftp-master.debian.org and non-us.debian.org. I think they
should both work as I followed the same procedure I used for sparc64
and that appears to have worked. However as a precautionary measure,
please try uploading only one or two packages on the first day (as
opposed to hundreds) to see how dinstall reacts? Any problems,
questions or abuse to [EMAIL PROTECTED] please.
--
James
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+49-waiting-4-telekom
"If you're not having fun right now, you're wasting your time."
