On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 4:30:03 PM UTC-8, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > The port itself is in a good shape, that said we are still lacking DSAed > build daemons (and thus autosigning). It is built mostly on 4 machines, > 3 hosted in China by Aron Xu and 1 hosted in Germany by Andi Barth. In > addition the mipsel build daemons also build mips64el packages as the > lowest priority. The porterbox etler.d.o has both mipsel and mips64el > chroots. We are waiting for Octeon III hardware sponsored by Imagination > Technologies that will be used for the 3 MIPS ports (they are able to > boot on both endianness). That is the last blocker on our side and that > is why we haven't requested to get mips64el into testing yet.
What is the current status of getting mips64el into stretch? As a relative Debian newbie, I can't tell from https://release.debian.org/stretch/arch_qualify.html exactly what's missing. I may be able to scare up a couple of Cavium Octeon II boards, if that would help. --Ed
