YunQiang Su: > On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Niels Thykier <[email protected]> wrote: >> [...] >> AFAICT, we are still missing: >> >> * A rebuild of the last package [mipsel64import] > > This is a bug of gcc, and the gcc team in IMG is working on it. > It also effects lua. >
Thanks for the update. :)
>> * DSA maintained buildds (admittedly, I did not look for one).
>
> mips64el shares the same machines with mipsel.
> All machines for mipsel can be configured to build for mips64el at the
> same time.
>
> [...]
In other words, there is a DSA buildd?
I notice we have the following list of mipsel/mips64el buildds:
* mips64el: eberlin, mipsel-aql-01, mipsel-aql-02, mipsel-manda-01,
mipsel-manda-02
- I presume none of them are DSA given mips64el currently has a note
of not having a DSA buildd.
* mipsel: mayer, eysler, rem, phrixos (non-DSA), helle (non-DSA)
Are these lists up to date? If so, we only seem to have 4 DSA buildds
to be shared between mipsel and mips64el. Are some of these being
migrated to/replaced with DSA buildds?
Thanks,
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
