Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm aware that this is how it should be, but many situations happen when > you're just out of time or you forgot to reply to this specific bug > or. That just happens. It is great that people like Lucas remind you of > it and even attach a complete fix. So far so good. > > My point here is this: why use a DELAYED/2 queue when a DELAYED/10 > upload suffices just as well to reach the goal, but allows the "waken > up" maintainer to incorporate it in their own upload beforehand if they > so wish? Seems to make all happy.
Well, I'd really like to get people out of the habit of thinking that NMUs are something horrible. DELAYED/2 gets a fix out to the users of unstable faster, and then the maintainer can make another upload later. Of course, I'm on LowThresholdNMU. :) -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
