On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 10:04:38AM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Eeek! Can we have the requirement that advocacies are GPG-signed back?
Gladly, if you can figure a convenient way of doing it. Note that advocacies here are notifications only: I reckon it's ok to have unsigned things here, as long as the website keeps track of authenticated submissions. There might be a better way to send the notifiactions. I like putting the advocate in the From header so that a conversation in the list can happen, but a 'Person X advocated person Y in nm.debian.org and this is the advocacy message' kind of blurb at the top of mails might make it more clear to see what's going on. I figured I'd get it to work somehow first, then once we see how it works, we can reason on incremental improvements. Ciao, Enrico -- GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini <enr...@enricozini.org>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
