Hi dkg, > link for his contributions,
it is "generated" by nm website, but here we are https://portfolio.debian.net/result?username=unit193&nonddemail=unit193%40ubuntu.com&aliothusername=&gpgfp=8DB3E586865D2B4A2B185A5C5001E1B09AA3744B&forumsid=&wikihomepage=&email=unit193%40ubuntu.com&name=Unit+193 >Had Unit 193 identified themself here as "William Jones", it would have >been just as easily a pseudonym, but you would have been less >uncomfortable with it. And it would have been arguably more deceptive. >Some people have life circumstances where exposing their official legal >identity puts them at risk. Consider a person pursued by a stalker, a >citizen under the grip of an oppressive state, or person in an abusive >relationship with a jealous and controlling partner. Should those >people not be welcome in the debian project? BTW, the question about nick/vs real names should be handled in my opinion by DAM or a GR, the question I would like to know, has been posted also by Paultag >I don't know how I'd sign their key, but I'd be willing to. *HOW* can he get signatures? *WHO* can verify the identity? *WHO* is in charge of keeping it private? (DAM?) *IS* acceptable to sign an identity without knowing the person behind it? Note: please keep this general, not specific to any application (this is why I changed the subject) thanks, G.
