> > if such things do not really need to build a specific package for them > > (what about tuareg "providing" (Debian parlance) some thing like > > "ocaml-mode" (also in [but not "provided" the standard package ocaml (it > > already contains an emacs mode if I remember well...) > > and > > a diversion is called for here, maybe, if both modes cannot be used > simoultanously. I don't know the mechanism for it though. Why shouldn't it be possible to install both on a system, and let every user decide which mode he wants to use? -Ralf. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- tuareg et/ou ocaml-dev ? Ralf Treinen
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-dev ? Sven LUTHER
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-dev ? Georges Mariano
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-dev ? Ralf Treinen
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-dev ? Sven LUTHER
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-dev ? Ralf Treinen
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-dev ? Sven LUTHER
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-dev ? Ralf Treinen
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-dev ? Ian Zimmerman
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-dev ? Jean-Francois Monin
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-dev ? Sven LUTHER
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-dev ? Ralf Treinen
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-d... Ian Zimmerman
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-d... Sven LUTHER
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-d... Ian Zimmerman
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-d... Remi VANICAT
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-d... Ian Zimmerman

