On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 01:45:23AM -0800, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > Er, _alternatives_, not diversions, is the proper mechanism for this. > I am not a Debian maintainer (yet), but I seem to know a bit more > about the system than some official maintainers :( Sorry, i never used that stuff, ... but i guess you are right, it should be alternatives, and i am sure, if both can be installed at the same time, it would be best to have both installed at the same time. But then now, i am a vi user, and thus am not much into emacs. Hope Ralf will handle this right. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- tuareg et/ou ocaml-dev ? Ralf Treinen
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-dev ? Sven LUTHER
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-dev ? Georges Mariano
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-dev ? Ralf Treinen
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-dev ? Sven LUTHER
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-dev ? Ralf Treinen
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-dev ? Sven LUTHER
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-dev ? Ralf Treinen
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-dev ? Ian Zimmerman
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-dev ? Jean-Francois Monin
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-dev ? Sven LUTHER
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-dev ? Ralf Treinen
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-d... Ian Zimmerman
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-d... Sven LUTHER
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-d... Ian Zimmerman
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-d... Remi VANICAT
- Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-d... Ian Zimmerman

