On Wed, 26 Dec 2001 20:47:04 +0100 Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I really prefer libocaml-xxx, following the perl schema. > > s/libocaml-xxx/libxxx-ocaml/g > I always thought that libXXX scheme is rather inadequate ocaml-libXXX is much more interesting since : the main part/criteria of interest is first : ocaml then comes the "usage" (the 'base', the 'tools', the 'libs'... and so on) I have a lot of packages for backport compiling on my disk, due to the libXXX scheme, nothing is sorted in a simple dired (emacs) view because this scheme does not follow the simplest sort algorithm implemented in every tools namely the well-know alphabetical order... You have a great bunch of libXXX, where you cannot find easily what you waant because perl's stuff, python's stuff, gtk, kde, gnome are "mixed" in the same space ... It would be nice to have a easy way to say "ok, everything about ocaml is here, in this screen. Since grep tricks will work if we follow any structured naming scheme, (lib/XXX/ocaml, ocaml/lib/XXX ...) let's keep a simple intrinsic order in our scheme... Yes, think different. (the real OCaml attitude ? ;-) Cheers -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tel: (33) 03 20 43 84 06 INRETS, 20 rue �lis�e Reclus fax: (33) 03 20 43 83 59 BP 317 -- 59666 Villeneuve d'Ascq http://www3.inrets.fr/estas/mariano -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
