On Thu, 27 Dec 2001 09:50:50 +0100 Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does not seems to me a valid point for break an almost standard > (there are a lot of perl package that follows this schema). Who said something like : "(but sure, we are packaging OCaml and not perl :)))" ?? > Think also about the pool structure, package that starts with "lib" > are kept in a separate tree, why you want that ocaml libraries will > not be included in this tree? A user knows that all libraries are > kept in the"lib" tree. Simply, I would like to have ocaml stuff in the same tree ... I'm an ocaml user not a library user... Again, think different, we are NOT SOFTWARE we are USERS ... (at least for me :-) -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tel: (33) 03 20 43 84 06 INRETS, 20 rue �lis�e Reclus fax: (33) 03 20 43 83 59 BP 317 -- 59666 Villeneuve d'Ascq http://www3.inrets.fr/estas/mariano -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
