On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 11:35:56AM +0100, J�r�me Marant wrote: > Sven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > "ocaml.opt" ? ( I just checked - periods are allowed in package names). > > > > Mmm, yes, this may be a good name also. > > > > I was not particularly imaginative at that time. > > The period does not make a very pretty name. (I love dashes). > Why not also ocaml-opt-compilers or simply ocaml-opt ?
I would prefer the dash form also, but then, is ocaml-opt informative enough ? opt stands for optimized and not for optional though, isn't it ? Still notice that the native code compilers suffer a bigger load time, at least it was so some time ago, so the files need to be real big for the advantage to be noticed, so it is not a plain 'optimization'..` Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
