On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 11:40:05AM +0100, Sven wrote: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 11:25:57AM +0100, Judica�l Courant wrote: > > This might indeed be a good idea (it requires no more nor less work than > > providing an empty package). Or even better: provide an ocaml-best > > package in ocaml-native-compilers and provide this package when there is > > no optimized compiler. > > Mmm, nice, i like that idea ... > > I may most probably go for it.
If it is feasible though, don't know if the provides can be arch dependant. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
