Hello, On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 08:34:24AM +0900, Yamagata Yoriyuki wrote: > From: "Sylvain LE GALL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: RFS: headache, ocamlgsl, ocamlgraph, ocamldap, cameleon, camomile > Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:52:35 +0100 > > > By the way : i remove UnicodeData.txt from the source, i replace it at > > compile time by the coming along with perl-module ( unicore ). This one > > is more recent ( 4.0.X ), and it permits me to have a very good > > workaround concerning possible licencing problem ( ie, the problem we > > have discussed some time ago ). > > > > Do you think there should be issue with this replacement ? > > You have to replace other files (CaseFolding.txt, PropList.txt, etc) > in unidata dir to the same newer version. Also, you should note that > these files other than UnicodeData.txt have the same licencing > problem. >
Ok, i note that. > I'm curious about why Perl data do not have a licencing problem. What > starategy Perl people used? Maybe we could solve the problem in the > same way. > In fact i don't know. But perl-module is DFSG free, so using data from DFSG free package permit me not to care of licencing for camomile ( ie the problem doesn't come from this package ). > > Another point : locales, mappings ( if i remember well ) are data from > > external source ( IBM and something i don't remember ), where do you > > get it ? > > The locales come from icu. (icu-i18ndata in Debian?) The mappings > come from libc locales. Yep, i was thinking of using this one. > > Finally, you may want to check the library after the change. > http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/camomile/camomile-test-0.4.1.tar.bz2 > Ok, i will download the test. Kind regard Sylvan Le Gall -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
