Hello, On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 02:55:03PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 12:33:59AM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote: > > - ocamlgraph > > I've looked at ocamlgraph and the package is ok. > > Thus I decided to sponsor it and ... I'm uploading it right now. >
First of all, a lot of thanks for the upload. Well, as you told me, you are a bit disturb by the fact, that ocamlgraph gives libgraph-ocaml-dev. I agree it is not a perfect scheme for naming. However, i permit to resend this mail to d.o.m. since i have also a libldap-ocaml-dev which is build from ocamldap. So what should be our policy concerning naming scheme ? Do we choose name from functionnality ( graph and ldap ) or do we choose from upstream name ( ocamlgraph and ocamldap ) ? I really don't care about this... It is just a free question. Kind regard Sylvain Le Gall ps : should i rename and remove libldap-ocaml-dev ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
