On Friday 10 September 2004 11:21 am, Sven Luther wrote: > > Argh, this is all so complex and wrong. Why not use Arch and > > tla-buildpackage? > > Because tla is horrendous and uncomprehensible :)
The docs are better now :-) www.gnuarch.org > Well, what guarantee do you have that the tarball will always be > available ? If nothing else it should always go with the tagged Why do you need that guarantee? > versions, but then, arch doesn't support proper tagging anyway. Actually, it's called configs, but the need for tags/svn cp/whatever is mostly removed by its design. > > Arch makes it a lot easier to have a "distributed" group of > > maintainers, too. > > Yeah, but there is benefit for a centralized repo too. Arch can still do that :-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
