Hello, On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:56:12AM +0100, Samuel Mimram wrote: > Hi, > > Argh! > > Having a look at this problem I dicovered that hevea was under the QPL > which is generally considered as non-free if I remember correctly the > events of this summer concerning OCaml. Sven, I'm I correct? Should this > package be moved to non-free?
Frankly, I did not follow the discussion about QPL during the summer. Is there really a *consensus* that all QPL-licenced software is not DFSG-free? -Ralf. -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
