On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:23:17PM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote: > Hello, > On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:09:27PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 08:46:41PM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote: > > > If you made a debian repository on alioth, i propose to rebuild ocaml > > > package for arch i386 ( it was a big problem for me last time, because > > > i386 wasn't build in unstable, because of latency with lablgtk ). > > > > Well, this is the same I proposed with the exception I propose using > > experimental instead of an alioth repository. > > > > I think experimental is more suitable since it is more "official" than > > an alioth repository. > > > > Humm, well i don't disagree to your statement. There is only one problem > : do i have the right to upload to experimental ( considering i am not a > DD ) ?
No, but we can sponsor you. > ( if i can, i agree on the fact that an alioth repo is not mandatory ). Well, the other thing for a non-experimental repo is that all the NEW packages can make it into it. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
