On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 02:14:49PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:09:29PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote: > > Ocamlsdl needs ocamlopt and it seems that ocamlopt is not > > provided by all architectures (not suprisingly). > > So we can't have a bytecode versione of ocamlsdl, right? > > > So what is the best way to handle this? Should I specify > > all the architecture providing ocamlopt in the Architecture: > > field? > > Yes, this is the right choice. > IIRC Ralf's solution will inhibit ocamlsdl from entering testing due to > missing package build dependencies.
to simplify things, i will install a file with the ocaml package which will list all ocamlopt supported architecture, so you can easily generate such build dependencies automatically with a variable substitution. I will do this in my next ocaml package. (BTW, dll.so will go into /usr/lib/ocaml/stublibs, Xavier is ok with this choice, and it will be standard in 3.05). Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
