On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 02:21:37PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 02:14:49PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:09:29PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote: > > > Ocamlsdl needs ocamlopt and it seems that ocamlopt is not > > > provided by all architectures (not suprisingly). > > > > So we can't have a bytecode versione of ocamlsdl, right? > > Not exactly. The configure script requires ocamlopt currently > and Makefile require both bytecode and opt compilers. > I think this could be changed by upstream in the future.
The upstream build process is broken then, you can either fix it yourself or fill a bug about it :))) Usually fixing such things is an easy matter of duplicating the make targets and have one for bytecode and one for nativecode. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
