On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 02:59:54PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote: > - Maxence proposed to rename OCaml-targeted applications
We need to know what you mean with "applications" in the statemente above. If you mean standalone applications not related to ocaml development I'm in favour of totally remove the name ocaml from the package name, an application is usefull for what he do, not for the language in which it is implemented. If you mean tools related to ocaml developing ocaml-<something> is a worth mentioning name. > - should we rename Camlp4 extensions to ocaml-<package> > as proposed by Stefano and Remi, or camlp4-<package>, or > anything else? If we plan to add many syntax extensions to ocaml (which is reasonable due to camlp4 usefulness), we can consider to adopt a naming schema .... mumble mumble .... ocaml-syn-<something>? syn-ocaml-<something>? boh ... Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli - undergraduate student of CS @ Univ. Bologna, Italy [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ICQ# 33538863 | http://www.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro "I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!" -- G.Romney
pgpcQV5ObkGnT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
