On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 02:59:54PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > > Hello, > > I'd like that we decide together on some package > naming we discuss recently: > - Maxence proposed to rename OCaml-targeted applications > to ocaml-<package> (at least, he proposed that for > cameleon packages): for example, ocaml-zoggy, ocaml-report, > ocaml-dbforge, and so on.
Well, and then we will start the thread about the naming scheme not being coherent with the library one, and we should rename all libraries as ocaml-<name>-lib and ocaml-<name>-dev ? BTW, please don't forget to use correct dependencies with every ocaml package that use bytecode code, even if it is standalone code, it should depend on ocaml-base-3.06, not some other strange stuff. Especially all older (well those in woody at least) such package that do not have both the ocaml-base (>= 3.04) and ocaml-base (<< 3.05) dependencies are _BROKEN_. But then they are in woody, nothing much we can do on this. BTW2, ... about ocaml 3.06 and testing, well i wrote mail to debian-devel and was ignored, does anyone else have an idea of who i should pester next ? Can someone fill build reports against the buildd or such ? Well, i will try writing to the appropriate porter list to see what did happen. Friendly, Sven Luther
