On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:13:16PM +0100, Remi VANICAT wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 06:08:19PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 05:58:09PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > >> > BTW, about ocamlfind, should you not test that /etc/ocamlfind exists > >> > before opening the dialog about it ? > >> > >> Uh? If you have findlib installed you have /etc/ocamlfind.conf > >> > >> > BTW2, what about moving /etc/ocamlfind to /etc/ocaml/findlib ? > >> > >> Well, you are right I have to do it, I will do it iff you put the latest > >> META file I've sent here in the lablgtk package :-PPPPP > > > > Mmm, Are you sure everyone agrees in linking gnome and glade in per > > default ? I think last we discussed it we agreed not to do it. But then, > > personnally i don't care, i don't use ocamlfind. > > well some hard fact so : I've compiled the following ocaml code with > different option : > > -- test.ml -- > > let rec f x = f (x + 1) > > let _ = f 0 > -- en of test.ml -- > > compiled as : > ocamlc -I +lablgtk lablgtk.cma test.ml -o gtk.out > ocamlc -I +lablgtk lablgtk.cma lablgnome.cma lablglade.cma test.ml -o all.out > gtk.out all.out > size of the executable : 9837 9811 > virtual and resident memory : 1128 1908 > shared memory : 876 1492 > > so it's not a so big problem.
Well, executabl is smaller, but still big. The memory usage is 70% bigger though. As said, i don't care, i don't use ocamlfind anyway. Friendly, Sven Luther
