On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 08:33:53AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 11:44:09AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > Mmm, because of the libpng2 thingy ? > > Right. > > > Do you know what the current status of libpng is ? there is libpng2-dev, > > libpng12-0-dev and libpng3-dev. > > Uhm, no, I don't know ...
Well, as i understood it, libpng2 is for gnome 1 and gtk1, and libpng3 is for gnome2, not really clear what libpng12-0 is about ... Mmm, now i understand, libpng3 says : This package is superceded by libpng12, provided for transitional purposes. I guess this means that there really is only libpng2 and libpng12-0 ? > > Mmm, could you tell me why camlimages depend on lablgtk ? > > OXimage and Ximage modules uses Gdk's features. Ok, ... > > What do you think about this, did you test if camlimages builds with > > lablgtk2 ? maybe we could also split from the camlimages package the > > No I haven't tested, but I'm wondering about another point: do you > think that camlimages could be built using libpng3-dev? Given the above, if i parse the description correctly, i would say no, but best would be to ask the libpng maintainer, maybe ? BTW, you didn't respond me about the ocamlimages duplication, and if it is ok with me to upload the new lablgtk ? And BTW, could you please unprioterize the severity of your bug report, serious for something i cannot even upload to fix is a bit extreme, don't you think ? Friendly, Sven Luther
