Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
> Well, apparently nobody cares, i uploaded the package yesterday, but it > need first to be reviewed by the ftp-masters. well, at least for me, it is the "it's work, so I don't have to tell him" things. [...] > > Another issue i just thought about, while responding to a mail on the > caml-list, is that we should also change the ocamlrun binary so that it > is named ocamlrun-version, so that multiple version of ocaml-base (with > their libraries) can be installed at the same time, so it is possible to > transparently run bytecode executables built with older versions of the > ocaml packages. One way to achieve this, is that once the migration is > completed, i would upload a runtime only package of the previous > version, and the same goes for libraries. well, for compatibility issue with executable compiled on other computer, we should use diversion or things like that to have an ocamlrun executable. [...] -- Rémi Vanicat [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dept-info.labri.u-bordeaux.fr/~vanicat
