Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> What's the problem with them? > > Fine with me, we decided against it last time though. > > Basically, there are two issues, the one is the ocaml dependency, the > other the interlibrary stuff.
Oh no, don't tell me we're back again. > We would finish with something of the kind (for library foo). > > libfoo-1.2.5-ocaml-3.06 and libfoo-1.2.5-ocaml-3.06-dev. We can provide an Ocaml plus a CVS snapshot of OCaml which won't get any support for our libraries. So, we wouldn't need that. No need to make things more difficult than they are. -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org
