On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 10:44:15PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 10:10:26PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote: > >> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> >> So, it doesn't break anything and this is what we want (that is, we can > >> >> never have 3.06-built libs and ocaml 3.07 installed at a time). > >> > > >> > Yes, that is what we decided previously, you were the one asking about > >> > it. Also, i was thinking about easying the unstable->testing migration. > >> > >> What I described is the same migration scheme as many apps in Debian. > > > > Yes, and with the problems of all debian packages. It means we need to > > have all the libraries and all the ocaml binary packages and ocaml ready > > to enter testing at the same time. > > Forget about testing, transitions happen in unstable. > We don't have to work around testing flaws; testing doesn't work; > testing doesn't make a better release.
Yes, a two stage testing would be nice, one for the base system and build-essential, and the other for the rest of the stuff. That said, if you do this, you will not catch the bugs unless you build every package two times. > most of the problems we have today come from testing which should be > deeply reworked. Well, the only problem is the buggy libc6. Friendly, Sven Luther
