On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 05:03:41PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote: > En réponse à Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Not what you presented in your website. > > > > Yes, sure, but i repeat, these are not the package i will upload, they > > are just interim packages, i had not the time to work on it more, but > > i > > will go the way of packages which will be fully parallel instalable, > > as > > we discussed. I just didn't had time yet. > > So you shall not give this pointer which does not reflect what's > going to be.
Oh come one, i gave it to Stefano, who was not following all our previous discution, and told him that this where the being worked on package, and that there where not (yet) ready. > The big problem will probably be ocamlrun and the hability > to have #!/usr/bin/ocaml-<version>. Is it currently possible? No problem, you just modify the script that gets copied into each bytecode program. I can do that if needed in the debian/rules, but am looking for a more clean solution, with a configure time switch, which i can even send upstream if needed. > Same thing will ocamlmklib and such ocaml programs that call > other ocaml programs. Yes, these are the problematic ones. Let me time to look at it and provide a propper patch. Other problems are : ocamldoc.sty (a simple alternative should do it). emacs mode (should install in a subdirectory and provide alternatives ?) In the meantime is it more important to fix the remaining bugs and other problems that stop ocaml from entering testing. > So I fear that we won't be able to reach our goal. Huh, do you believe i will not be able to achieve a nice working ocaml-3.06 package, which will be parallel installable ? I think it is possible, and as said, hope even to provide a patch upstream. I will do it in a clean way though. If this fails, no problem i can simply provide a ocaml 3.06-16 package with the latest fixes that went into ocaml-3.06 3.06-16. In fact i have such a thing almost ready. Friendly, Sven Luther
