Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 10:18:24PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote: > > > Other problems are : > > > > > > ocamldoc.sty (a simple alternative should do it). > > > > alternative would mean prioritise ocaml versions. > > No, you can call update-alternatives in the ocaml dummy package. This > way the user can easily change the alternatives if he need to (i may > even provide a script or something such). Alternatives is the right way > of doing symlinks without breaking a lot of stuff. I even already do so > for the caml includes files.
Alternatives are not such a right. Don't you remember the Perl mess using alternatives before Brendan O'Dea took it over? > > > emacs mode (should install in a subdirectory and provide alternatives > ?) > > > > Hmm, we can put it in a separate package ocaml-mode and only one > ocaml-mode > > would be allowed to be installed at a time. > > I don't know, i am no emacs specialist. Ralf, what do you think of it ? Let's do it like Python. > > > In the meantime is it more important to fix the remaining bugs and other > > > problems that stop ocaml from entering testing. > > > > Damned testing. > > Why, it will help us to do more experimenting while having a fallback in > case of problems. Testing does not personaly help me. Autobuilders' logs do. .. > > I think it would be wise to get our changes blessed by the OCaml team. > > Yes, sure, no problem i can handle that. > > BTW, can i ask you some question ? On your ibook, when you boot into > MacOSX, is it easy to print .ps files ? Even if the printer doesn't know > anything about postscript ? I'm afraid I don't use MacOSX at all :-) I only use Free Software :-) Cheers, ___________________________________ Webmail Nerim, http://www.nerim.net/
