Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 11:20:57AM +0200, Remi Vanicat wrote:

[...]

>> This in not completely true. One could want to write a binding for a
>> gtk widget not in lablgtk, without having to modify lablgtk, while
>> using some of the lablgtk function. Then it could be useful to link
>> the new stublib to the lablgtk one.
>
> I would be glad to accept any such patch to lablgtk, and i guess so will
> upstream.
>
> In fact that is the way we did it when adding SVG support to
> lablgtk2.

well, lablgtkmathview is such a binding, and nobody seem to complain.

lablgtkmathview is even a more complicated example seem it use also
the gdome binding.

[...]


-- 
Rémi Vanicat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dept-info.labri.u-bordeaux.fr/~vanicat

Reply via email to