On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 12:21:56PM +0200, Remi Vanicat wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 11:20:57AM +0200, Remi Vanicat wrote: > > [...] > > >> This in not completely true. One could want to write a binding for a > >> gtk widget not in lablgtk, without having to modify lablgtk, while > >> using some of the lablgtk function. Then it could be useful to link > >> the new stublib to the lablgtk one. > > > > I would be glad to accept any such patch to lablgtk, and i guess so will > > upstream. > > > > In fact that is the way we did it when adding SVG support to > > lablgtk2. > > well, lablgtkmathview is such a binding, and nobody seem to complain. > > lablgtkmathview is even a more complicated example seem it use also > the gdome binding.
Yes, see my other mail as response. Friendly, Sven Luther
