On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 10:54:56AM -0800, David Fox wrote: > Sven Luther wrote: > > >That said, i could make a ocaml-interpreter package, which would be > >provided, replaced and conflicted by the ocaml package. What do you > >think of that ? > > > > > > I was thinking that since the ocaml-interpreter is all files that are > currently part of the ocaml package, you could make ocaml depend on > ocaml-interpreter and make ocaml-interpreter depend on ocaml-base.
Yep, i understand, but ocaml-interpreter is part of the ocaml package. So either you get the true thing (ocaml) or only the interpreter. Another alternative is to move the interpreter stuff in ocaml-base ... No i think not, the stuff you want is 3 Mo big, and ocaml-base is only 424 installed size. Friendly, Sven Luther
