On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 08:55:35PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > Also, we could rename ocaml-base as ocaml-runtime, and have ocaml-base > contain the interpreter.
NO! Don't do it! We would have to change all packages that depend on ocaml-base. And it would be a big mess since the package ocaml-base wouldn't provide any longer what it used to provide. Please leave ocaml-base as it is. The runtime system is the most basic part of the ocaml system, and it should keep its name. Why not call the new interpreter package "ocaml-toplevel" since this is what it provides? -Ralf. --
