On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 04:40:57PM +0000, Richard Jones wrote: > On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 04:17:02PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > Ok, i am having a look currently. > > > > There are still a few warning in the build process, but i guess these > > are harmless. Still it would be nice to solve them : > > All the warnings generated now are unavoidable as far as I know. > > > ocamldoc -html -stars -sort -I +pcre -I /usr/lib/ocaml/3.07/postgres -d html > > apache.ml cgi.ml dbi.ml dbi_mysql.ml dbi_perl.ml dbi_postgres.ml > > mod_caml.ml registry.ml apache.mli cgi.mli dbi.mli dbi_mysql.mli > > dbi_perl.mli > > dbi_postgres.mli mod_caml.mli registry.mli > > File "cgi.ml", line 308, characters 5-35: > > Warning: this expression should have type unit. > > File "cgi.ml", line 476, characters 1-16: > > Warning: this expression should have type unit. > > File "dbi_mysql.ml", line 95, characters 3-15: > > Unbound value Mysql.escape > > File "dbi_perl.ml", line 23, characters 0-9: > > Unbound module Perl > > 2 error(s) encountered > > make[1]: [html/index.html] Erreur 1 (ignor?e) > > OK, this is a mistake in the Makefile ... The ocamldoc target > shouldn't try to parse dbi_perl.ml if perl4caml isn't installed. This > error can probably be ignored safely. > > > Mmm, does modcaml depend on perl4caml ? > > It suggests perl4caml, but doesn't strictly depend on it.
But maybe it should build-depend on it ? > > And : > > > > ocamlc -output-obj -g -w s -I +pcre -I /usr/lib/ocaml/3.07/postgres > > dynlink.cma str.cma pcre.cma postgres.cma dbi.cmo dbi_postgres.cmo > > apache.cmo mod_caml_config.cmo mod_caml.cmo cgi.cmo -o mod_caml.o > > mod_caml.c: Dans la fonction ? caml_startup ?: > > mod_caml.c:13313: attention : implicit declaration of function > > `caml_startup_code' > > Yes, this message is unavoidable as far as I know. I think it's > because the OCaml header files don't declare this function. Ok. > > However, for perl4caml, it doesn't build with : > > > > gcc -Wall -Wno-unused -I/usr/lib/perl/5.8.2/CORE -c -o perl_c.o > > perl_c.c > > Dans le fichier inclus ? partir de /usr/lib/perl/5.8.2/CORE/perl.h:37, > > ? partir de perl_c.c:24: > > /usr/lib/perl/5.8.2/CORE/config.h:3691:1: attention : ? > > HAS_GETHOSTBYADDR_R ? red?fini > > Dans le fichier inclus ? partir de /usr/include/caml/misc.h:22, > > ? partir de /usr/include/caml/alloc.h:20, > > ? partir de perl_c.c:12: > > /usr/include/caml/config.h:72:1: attention : ceci est la localisation > > d'une pr?c?dente d?finition > > Dans le fichier inclus ? partir de /usr/lib/perl/5.8.2/CORE/perl.h:37, > > ? partir de perl_c.c:24: > > /usr/lib/perl/5.8.2/CORE/config.h:3704:1: attention : ? > > HAS_GETHOSTBYNAME_R ? red?fini > > Dans le fichier inclus ? partir de /usr/include/caml/misc.h:22, > > ? partir de /usr/include/caml/alloc.h:20, > > ? partir de perl_c.c:12: > > /usr/include/caml/config.h:71:1: attention : ceci est la localisation > > d'une pr?c?dente d?finition > > In file included from /usr/lib/perl/5.8.2/CORE/op.h:484, > > from /usr/lib/perl/5.8.2/CORE/perl.h:2344, > > from perl_c.c:24: > > /usr/lib/perl/5.8.2/CORE/reentr.h:611: error: field `_crypt_struct' has > > incomplete type > > make[1]: *** [perl_c.o] Erreur 1 > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/luther/debian/modcaml/perl4caml-0.3.6' > > Grrr. this is really annoying. What's happening here is two things. > > Firstly there are _two_ header files, both called config.h, and both > containing conflicting symbol names which need to be included in order > to link with OCaml and with perl. Both OCaml and perl use the C > namespace without regard to other libraries. So the warnings are > unavoidable, but safe. > > Secondly there seems to be some problem with Perl 5.8.2. Where do you > get this from? I'm using Debian/unstable here, and I only seem to have > Perl 5.8.1. http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/perl.html Shows perl 5.8.2 was uploaded on november 7, and reached the archive yesterday. > > Not sure about this, but maybe a missing build-dependency, or an > > incompatible header package or something such. I have upgraded my sid > > install this morning. > > > > Also, when installing apache, i get : > > > > Param?trage de libapache-ocaml (1.0.0-5) ... > > dpkg : des probl?mes de d?pendances emp?chent la configuration de > > libapache-ocaml-dev : > > libapache-ocaml-dev d?pend de apache ; cependant : > > Paquet apache n'est pas install?. > > dpkg : erreur de traitement de libapache-ocaml-dev (--install) : > > probl?mes de d?pendances - laiss? non configur? > > Des erreurs ont ?t? rencontr?es pendant l'ex?cution : > > libapache-ocaml-dev > > > > But then, i have apache2 and not apache installed. > > Not sure about this. There's a bug in apache2 (in Debian) which > prevents you from using any Apache module which links with > pcre. Apparently it is possible to build Apache2 so that it doesn't Did you fill a bug report already against apache2 ? > have this bug, but since I'm not really too interested in Apache2 I > haven't verified this. Anyway the long and the short of this is that > you won't be able to build a working mod_caml package which works with > Debian's Apache2 in its current form. I'm using Apache 1.3 here. :(( Friendly, Sven Luther
