On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 06:00:07PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > But maybe it should build-depend on it ?
I think that if it build-depends on it, then it should strictly depend on it too. Otherwise the package will contain dbi_perl, but break if someone actually tried to use it. Really this is a bug in the Makefile. The ocamldoc rule shouldn't be run on files which can't be built. Anyway, whichever option is best for you. > http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/perl.html > > Shows perl 5.8.2 was uploaded on november 7, and reached the archive > yesterday. OK, I'm not _that_ up to date :-) I'll do an apt-get dist-upgrade & build tomorrow & see if I can reproduce it. > Did you fill a bug report already against apache2 ? Ben posted this to the Apache users list. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-users&m=106591900532673&w=2 I think he also filed a bug report with the Apache blokes too, but I can't find it now. Rich. -- Richard Jones. http://www.annexia.org/ http://freshmeat.net/users/rwmj Merjis Ltd. http://www.merjis.com/ - improving website return on investment "I wish more software used text based configuration files!" -- A Windows NT user, quoted on Slashdot.
