On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 03:21:49PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote: > On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 14:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > liblabltk-ocaml labltk stublibs > > liblabltk-ocaml-dev liblabltk-ocaml labltk header > I wouldn't mind those, except it might not be clear if this was a > different Tk lib than that distributed with ocaml.
We don't care, since ocaml is going to pull it in anyway. > > libbase-extra-ocaml extra stublibs > > libbase-extra-ocaml-dev libbase-extra-ocaml extra header > I think this name makes no sense. having 'base' and 'extra' together > is confusing. I agree on this one. If anything it would be libpervasives-ocaml or something such, let's just skip the libxxx-ocaml stuff for this one. > > libgraphics-ocaml graphics stublibs > > libgraphics-ocaml-dev graphics header > Since these would contain only ~5 files each, this seems a little excessive. > The graphics stuff should be combined with the labltk. Mmm. > Well, I'm just about done with the patch using the names as before. It > isn't too much of a pain to change the them, but it will be annoying. I > don't see the need to change. Can you submit them so i can have a go at them ? Don't expect an upload until end of next week though, unles you NMU it. Friendly, Sven Luther
