Salut, On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 10:02:03AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> The work of splitting the emacs stuff in a separate package > is almost done. Few questions though: > > 1/ it is called caml-mode in sources since it applies to caml light > as well. Shall I keep calling it caml-mode or ocaml-mode? I prefer to keep the upstream name caml-mode. > 2/ this new package depends on ocaml-nox, and ocaml-nox needs to > depend on it until etch is released (for transitional purpose), > which makes a circular dependency. Is this a problem? Maybe it is not necesarry to have ocaml-nox depend on caml-mode. It should be sufficient to state in the NEWS.Debian that the mode has been split off into a separate package. Not having caml-mode installed doesn't stop ocaml from working. On the other hand why the dependency of caml-mode on ocaml-nox? If it is only because caml-mode may call the ocaml compiler then a recommends seems sufficient, as it is the case with tuareg-mode. If you put the mods into svn before upload I can have a look at it. -Ralf. -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
