On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 02:05:53PM +0200, Remi Vanicat wrote: > 2005/9/3, Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Hi, > > > > gcc and al are standard packages. Is this really relevant? > > > > Cheers, > > gcc is not an essential package, only a build essential one. So yes, > to be policy compliant, we should depend on it. > We don't want one of our user to failed to compile one of his program > because he have no gcc installed, and do only ocaml > > On the other side, I believe that one could compile a program with > ocamlc without it (at least, when you use no C library). But I still > believe we should depend on it.
BTW, any idea how ocaml will behave when part of the libraries and runtime was built with gcc-3.3 and the rest with gcc-4.0 ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
