On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 04:45:03PM -0500, Eric Cooper wrote: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:19:01PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 08:19:12PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 06:51:01PM +0100, Samuel Mimram wrote: > > > > Unless someone objects to it, I'll package and upload OCaml 3.09.1 as > > > > soon as 3.09.0 is in testing. Do you all agree with a full rebuild? > > > > > > Yes, but let's do it like this : > > > > > > 1) we wait until ocaml 3.09.1 is built and installed on all > > > autobuilders. > > > > > > 2) we compose a list of all ocaml related packages. > > > > > > 3) we ask Steve to requeue all those ocaml related packages for a > > > binNMU, > > > and file RC bugs against all those that fail. > > > > But we still have to do a source upload for those packages which Depend > > on ocaml-*-3.09.0, I guess. I'm thinking of packages that are > > architecture=all, and compiled to byte-code. > > The packages in the SVN repository that have rules to generate > debian/control based on the OCaml API version will need to have a > newly-generated debian/control committed first, and then uploaded, right? > So it's not just a binNMU, unless I'm missing something.
Well, only the build-depend was generated, the rest is provided by dh_gencontrol, and as we used (ocaml >= 3.09.0) for build dependencies, this should work without problem, provided we guarantee that there is no older ocaml 3.09.0 on the autobuilders. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
