On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 20:37 +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 03:24:05AM +1000, skaller wrote:
> > Each kind of portability -- insensitive to ABI or > > insensitive to CPU -- is useful. Whilst Ocaml > > continues to provide a new ABI each patch, > > there should be a choice .. IMHO. > > This is not what is prefered for debian package, since using -custom means > that you cannot reuse the same bytecode binaries on different arches, and thus > end with a lot of identic and duplicate packages in debian, There's no way to reuse the bytecode in my package anyhow. The package also contains arch dependent binaries (compiled C++ code). -- John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net> Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
