On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 21:59 +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > Sure, then you are in the advi example, not the spamoracle one, and -custom is > indeed preferable. I think the policy mentions something of this kind. > > Now, the idea thing is to move the c++ bindings in their own binary package, > and you fall again in the spamoracle example.
Yes I agree. However, properly this would require about 20-30 separate packages. And that requires documenting and testing each component, as well as the Debian packaging scripts. I have enough trouble getting just ONE package to work :) -- John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net> Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
