Hi, On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 01:37:21PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> In particular, lintian and linda complain about the binary to be > unstripped, but if I understand correctly, this is necessary. Shall I > override the errors? You should never strip a *bytecode* executable produced with the -custom option (since this would remove the bytecod part of the executable). An executable compiled in native mode, however, must be striped. > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: I just had a quick look and tried to build the package. What strikes me is that the program is compiled twice. This is due to the fact that you use "build" as a timestamp but then declare it as a .PHONY target. In fact there is no reason to use an artificial timestap here. Instead, depend on the produced binary. > (PS: I am not subscribed to the list) If you want to package ocaml packages then please consider susbscribing. Regards -Ralf. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
