Hello, On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 05:44:35PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote: > Hi, > > Sylvain Le Gall wrote: > > I think that somebody should take care of rebuilding lablgtk2 and > > lablgl in order to unblock a lot of packages. > > > > If nobody step in -- and if you authorize me, i will do it. > > > > Anyone against this ? > > I don't really understand. What packages are blocked by lablgtk2 and > lablgl? They both have the same version in unstable and in testing. Do > you mean in experimental? >
Well, they need to be tested with ocaml 3.10.0 in experimental for the ongoing transition. > BTW, I think it would be nice to package the CVS version of lablgtk2. > There have been some nice improvements and it seems that releases of > lablgtk2 are not so frequent. > I think we should try to stick to the current version. We will have time to package CVS after the transition to 3.10.0 Regards Sylvain Le Gall -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
