On Thursday 12 July 2007, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 05:44:35PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote: > > I don't really understand. What packages are blocked by lablgtk2 and > > lablgl? They both have the same version in unstable and in testing. Do > > you mean in experimental? > > I intended it that way. > > > BTW, I think it would be nice to package the CVS version of lablgtk2. > > There have been some nice improvements and it seems that releases of > > lablgtk2 are not so frequent. > > Actually CVS (now SVN) changes are quite a lot. First of all lablgtk2 > has moved to GNA. Then it has swallowed lablgtksourceview, which we have > in Debian, so there is some migration work to be done between the two > packages (Replaces at all).
While we are at it, can we easily verify if #388518 is still present in the current lablgtk2 ? -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu> fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
