On Wed, Jan 9, 2008 at 22:20:34 +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote: > My package depends on ocaml-base-nox-3.10.0. The lintian check is > obviously wrong since it does not allow for a versionend > ocaml-base-nox package. I wonder what the right check would be: > > - if I undestand correctly the dependency must be on ocaml-base-nox, > not on ocaml. Or is there is a case in which the ocaml package > can provide the ocamlrun interpreter?
None that I can think of. > > - are there any reasons in which it makes sense to depend on > ocaml-base-nox and not on ocaml-base-nox-N.NN.NN for > packages that use #!/usr/binocamlrun scripts? I cannot think > of one > > So, in my opinion the right lintian check would be to check for dependency > on a package ocaml-base-nox-(\d\.)+. Or did I miss something? > It could be ocaml-base-(\d\.)+ if the program needs graphics stuff. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
